Have You Ever Considered Running for Office?

Guest blog by Senator Roy Afflerbach, Ret.

On January 15th I wrote about the value of a local municipal office as a public platform from which to advocate. I also noted that many municipal offices go uncontested and therefore offer unique opportunities for the dedicated animal advocate to win election to offices such as borough council, township supervisor, auditor or school director.

It is neither difficult nor expensive to wage a local campaign for many municipal offices. A stella bellagood primer for campaigning for office can be found here on the state website. Although you may want to enlist a few friends to help you obtain signatures on nominating petitions, and to carry your message forward, for a low-budget local office it is not necessary to go through the process of establishing a formal campaign committee. You will, however, need to file spending reports. If the amount is less than $250 per reporting period – and it is usually less than that for the entire campaign for smaller offices – you need only file a notarized statement to that effect.

The first day to circulate nominating petitions to place your name on the municipal ballot is February 17th and the final day to file those petitions is March 10th.  As I wrote two weeks ago, your county elections/voter registration office can provide you with a list of the offices that are open for election this year and can provide you with the petitions and with a list of the registered voters who live in the municipality where you wish to be a candidate.

If you wish to advocate on the host of animal issues that arise within a municipality, and to do so from the inside of government on an official public platform, now is the time to make that decision! Choose the office, obtain nominating petitions and, on February 17th , begin gathering signatures from registered voters of the party in which you are registered to place your name on the ballot as their candidate for the May 17th Primary Election!

Part two of a three part series by Senator Roy Afflerbach, Ret.

Roy Afflerbach



In addition to being a co- founder and Treasurer of Humane PA PAC, Senator Roy C. Afflerbach, Ret. is founder and President of The Afflerbach Group, LLC.

Posted in Pennsylvania election, Pennsylvania Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged ,

Be Part of the Solution!

Guest blog by Senator Roy Afflerbach, Ret.

Odd-numbered years offer a unique opportunity to Pennsylvania animal advocates who wish to obtain an official platform from which to advocate. Odd numbered years mean municipal elections. Counties cities, boroughs, and townships will be holding elections for executives, mayors, commissioners, councils, supervisors, auditors, school directors, and other local offices.


Although there are usually contested races in the larger municipalities for offices such as County Commissioner or Mayor, many of the offices in smaller municipalities often go uncontested and sometimes without any candidates for the post! This is usually because the posts are part-time and offer no pay or a minimal stipend for attending meetings. There is no easier method by which to influence the establishment than by carefully identifying the offices for which there are no challengers and becoming a candidate yourself.

Nearly all municipal offices require no special qualifications. As long as an individual does not have a criminal record, is a resident of the municipality and can obtain one-hundred signatures, or less in most cases, upon a petition to place their name on the ballot and can pay a nominal filing, that person can become a successful candidate.

Becoming a municipal official offers two significant advantages for the dedicated advocate. First and foremost, it is an official public platform from which to advocate. Consider the opportunity of being a school director. This position attracts media attention. It also offers the opportunity to advocate for curriculum, lunch menus, community service projects, public-private partnerships, and other initiatives to promote the compassionate treatment of animals. A second advantage is that an elected official automatically receives greater attention from other elected officials at all levels. Elected officials respect the fact that other elected officials have been chosen by a constituency whose viewpoints they purportedly represent.

February 17th is the first day to circulate nominating petitions to place your name on the ballot. Now is the time to evaluate if you may wish to infiltrate to advocate! Begin by contacting your county voter/elections administration office to determine what offices will be on the ballot in your municipality. Then, stay tuned to this blog for more “how-to” information.

Part one of a three part series by Senator Roy Afflerbach, Ret.

Roy Afflerbach



In addition to being a co- founder and Treasurer of Humane PA PAC, Senator Roy C. Afflerbach, Ret. is founder and President of The Afflerbach Group, LLC.

Posted in Community outreach, Pennsylvania election, Pennsylvania Politics | Tagged

New Chief Justice has Soft Spot for Animals

Amy Worden writes the Philly Dawg blog for The Philadelphia Inquirer. With her permission, we are reposting her excellent article New chief justice has soft spot for animals.

SADSupreme Court Justice Thomas G. Saylor takes the oath of office later today as the new chief justice of Pennsylvania’s highest court – the oldest appellate court in the nation.

To court watchers Saylor is known as a thoughtful, deliberative and intellectual jurist.

What many don’t know about this 17-year veteran of the Supreme Court bench, is that he also is an animal lover.

SaylorSaylor, in an interview last week, wanted to talk rescue pets not jurisprudence, telling this reporter: “I hear you like dogs.” I told him that I love all animals and Philly Dawg blog – which this month celebrates its sixth anniversary – and he began sharing stories of his life with animals.

Not only has Saylor owned many dogs and cats over the years (at one point he had five dogs and three cats under his roof), but he also served as a board member of the Humane Society of the Harrisburg area and has helped place strays himself.

Saylor told me he and fellow humane society board member, former special deputy secretary in the Bureau of Dog Law Enforcement Jessie Smith would together find homes for dogs that they found wandering in their Harrisburg area communities.

Today Saylor is down to just one dog, a seven-year-old rescued Belgian Shepherd named Ally. But he never goes far without his furry friend.

He said Ally comes with him to his office in Harrisburg every day.

In my 14 years covering Supreme Court sessions in the Capitol, I have yet to see a tail wagging under the bench in the Capitol.

But now I’ll keep my eye out for Ally.

Amy_WordenAmy Worden is a politics and government reporter for the Inquirer. In that capacity she has explored a range of animal protection issues from dog kennel law improvements and banning horse slaughter to the comeback of peregrine falcons and pigeon hunts. From hamsters to horses, animals have always been part of her life. To pass along a tip or contact Amy, click here. Reach Amy at aworden@phillynews.com.

Posted in Animal law, Pennsylvania Politics, Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Uncategorized | Tagged

Top 5 2015 Resolutions to Give Animals a Political Voice in PA

HNY5As 2015 begins, Humane PA PAC is publishing its top 5 New Year’s Resolutions and we hope that you will find them easy to adopt also and incorporate them among your own resolutions.  Together, we hope to make a meaningful difference for animals by passing  a record number of  laws to protect animals from cruel acts in 2015. Let’s pledge that in 2015  we will pass more humane legislation, engage more legislators, and continue to increase the influence of the animal vote.

  1.  We will respond to every legislative action alert from Humane PA, as well as other animal groups working on policy in Pennsylvania. When a bill is moving, a telephone call or email to a legislator’s office is extremely important. A call from you, the constituent, can make the difference between whether your legislator is a yes or a no vote on bills impacting animals.
  2. We will utilize social media to engage more people and to increase the visibility of the animal vote. To help engage more advocates in public policy, increase the visibility of the animal vote, please share posts on your own Facebook pages, and your friends’ pages, as well as to groups you belong to, and retweet Humane PA tweets too.
  3. We will thank our legislators each time they cosponsor or support a humane bill. It is important to let them know that we are watching and we appreciate when they vote humanely.
  4. We will recruit friends, family, coworkers, and everyone else we know who cares about animals to get involved in public policy.  Invite your friends to join the Humane PA community on Facebook, sign up to get Humane PA e-newsletters and alerts and regularly visiting the Humane PA website, which is full of resources to help advocates effectively make a difference.
  5. We will remind ourselves that one person can make a difference for animals and that our voices matter. Your phone call, email, visit, or letter can be what influences your legislator to support a piece of humane legislation or oppose a bad bill.

These resolutions are easily doable. Many of our resolutions can be fulfilled in two minutes – 2 minute actions that can yield huge results! We have already seen tangible proof that our actions are impacting the political climate: A record number of animal related bills were introduced in 2013/14; the numbers of co-sponsors for humane legislation are increasing; candidates are issuing position statements on the humane treatment of animals; legislators are posting animal concerns and events on their Facebook pages and websites; legislators are contacting many of you, their constituents, to ask your position on bills; the list goes on and on, demonstrating that your voice, and ours, matter.
2015 has enormous potential to improve the lives of animals – as a new legislative session begins.  It is time to pass stronger and more bills and to also defeat the bills that will cause more animal suffering. With many new legislators, it is up to us to help educate them about anti-cruelty legislation. Every lawmaker in the state should understand that their voters care deeply about the humane treatment of animals and expect their elected officials to do so also. We hope you will incorporate our resolutions into your daily lives to help create as much positive change for animals as possible in 2015. Happy New Year!

Posted in Animal cruelty, Happy New Year 2015, Legislation, Pennsylvania Law and animals, Pennsylvania legislation, Political Action Committees | Tagged ,

A Look Back at 2014

What a year 2014 has been for increasing the visibility and clout of the political voice for animals in Pennsylvania!hn

It’s been a year of growth, record-breaking engagement, elections, victories, and a heartbreaking defeat.

Here’s a snapshot review of accomplishments and setbacks in 2014:

  • 88.5% of Humane PA’s endorsed candidates were elected into state office in November’s election!
  • The 2013/14 session saw a record number of pro-animal bills introduced.
  • The Cost of Care of Seized Animals Act, which passed in 2013, was put to use in 2014.
  • We were successful in halting the harmful and oppressive “Ag Gag” bill which died on November 30th!
  • The animals and entire animal protection community suffered a heartbreaking loss when the House Majority Leader did not allow HB 1750 to receive a vote after it overwhelmingly passed the Senate.
  • The number of engaged humane voters in PA continues to grow! Between our Facebook, Twitter, website, and email lists, we are more than 33,000 members strong! Humane PA is now the largest, fastest growing and most interactive state political action committee for animals in the country.
  • We fulfilled our goals to engage more voters in the 2014 elections, with a robust GOTV effort, including over 8,000 hits on our endorsement list.
  • Humane PA was active in every corner of the state in 2014. We hosted Happy Hours attended by advocates, candidates and legislators, increasing local community involvement.
  • We saw a surge in involvement and support by people who are politically active in the local committees of both parties, increasing the influence and strength of the humane message.
  • Over 100 candidates contacted Humane PA PAC to apply for and request an endorsement.
  • Newly elected Governor Tom Wolf not only had a strong animal platform as a candidate, he now has included an animal advocacy leader on his transition team.

While we are proud of the progress we made in 2014, there is so much more to be done in our state. We are already gearing up to break records in the 2015/16 session and striving to be the strongest force of engaged voters possible. Stay tuned for information about our 2015 goals in our next blog.

Our legislature is starting to understand that the humane treatment of animals is not only right, but also something voters care about and a central factor in who they vote for.
Humane PA provides a unique and essential advocacy tool that other non-profits don’t and can’t. We are dedicated to grassroots and sustained political action to continue to pass and increase the number of laws that protect animals from cruelty and suffering. We are dedicated to a strong pro-animal voting bloc at the ballot box in Pennsylvania.

Humane PA PAC wishes everyone a happy, healthy and humane 2015!

Posted in Animal cruelty, Pennsylvania election, Pennsylvania legislation, Pennsylvania Politics, pigeon shoot, Political Action Committees | Tagged ,

State, local SPCAs battle scourge of unlicensed kennels

Amy Worden writes the Philly Dawg blog for The Philadelphia Inquirer. With her permission, we are reposting her excellent coverage of the state of unlicensed kennels in Pennsylvania.


For the third time in a week dogs in extreme situations have had to be rescued from unlicensed kennels in  Lancaster County.

In the first case, the Pennsylvania SPCA raided the home of a hoarder in Lititz who was housing 62 adult dog and puppies in every available enclosed space on her property, including Amish buggies.

A day later the Lancaster SPCA removed six dogs from am unlicensed breeding kennel in Strasburg – including a dog with no eyes and another with no legs.

On Sunday five dogs and puppies were pulled from a burning kennel in Quarryville in a fire linked to a faulty heat lamp. The owners were in Virginia at the time.

The cases highlight the proliferation of unlicensed kennels in Pennsylvania – especially in Lancaster County, home to the state’s largest number of commercial breeding kennels. In many cases these are breeders who were once licensed but gave up their licenses because of stricter kennel laws – or had their licenses revoked – but continued to operate illegally. In other cases individuals who were never licensed but pay fines and keep collecting or selling dogs.

“These puppy millers are like roaches. They scatter and go into hiding when Dog Law shines the light on them but then rear their ugly heads when they think the coast is clear,” said Libby Williams, founder of Pet Watch NJ, which monitors illegal kennels and rescue groups. “We catch underground sellers every week on online broker sites like Greenfield Puppies, Lancaster Puppies and Sunnyside Puppies.”

In the first bust last week, repeat offender Barbara Dienner – who was issued 60 dog law citations in the past three years – is facing another string of kennel charges – and PSPCA officials say – likely cruelty charges.

In the second case, an individual identified by state officials as Merv King will be charged with kennel violations. While a legal number of licensed dogs (23) dogs were found on the property King admitted to having above the legal limit (25) and will be cited for both criminal and civil violations, officials said. It was unclear if he will be cited for animal cruelty.

Dog law is continuing to investigate King’s tenant who fled the property with an unknown number of dogs, officials said.

In the Quarryville case, pictures- including of the charred kennel – posted on Lancaster Online show yellow Labs being taken from the property listed as Lapps Woodworking Shop. Recent online classified ads show the owner also sold boxers and German Shepherds.

The Dog Law Enforcement Office has stepped up its game in recent years, deploying a dog warden to focus on monitoring broker and breeder websites and pursue leads to track down unlicensed kennels

But the law and the courts often work against the state and humane agencies. Penalties are weak. The 25 dog limit allows lawbreakers to play shell games with dogs, moving them to nearby farms so they are never caught with 26 dogs on site.

Other states and the federal government limit the numbers to around three breeding dogs. Wardens in Pennsylvania can get a tip about an unlicensed kennel, arrive to find 25 unspayed and unneutered dogs and puppies and do nothing about it unless they track the breeders down on the internet and catch them selling additional dogs.

Violators are cited for summary offenses unless they are caught twice in the same year. Fines run from $80 to $300. Magisterial district judges often dismiss charges without hearing them, fail to use the sentencing and fining tools afforded them in statute, consolidate charges and or toss cases on disputed technicalities, say those who have appeared before them.

In the fiscal year that ended last June 30, the office collected fines and penalties totaling $355,000 but saw only $69,000 of it because of a law that directs all revenue above that amount to be turned over to the judiciary for computer upgrades (a bill sponsored by Rep. Kathy Watson (R., Bucks) to end that practice passed the House overwhelmingly, but ran into opposition from Sen. Stewart Greenleaf, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, who let the clock run out on the bill this session.

There are 2,307 licensed kennels in Pennsylvania subject to state oversight, including twice-annual inspections and the possibility of citations, civil penalties for violations to the dog law which establishes that dogs shall be housed in safe, humane and clean conditions. These include boarding facilities, shelters and breeders, any kennel selling or transferring as few as 26 or more dogs a year.

Dog law officials have been more vigilant in tracking down and citing unlicensed breeders by following up tips, tracking breeder sales online and monitoring classified ads. They have begun applying civil penalties of up to $1,000 a day for dog law violations which does not have to be forfeited to the judiciary.

I often hear from readers looking to purchase a dog who ask me about a certain breeder listed on a website or whose farm they drove by in Lancaster County with the “Puppies for Sale” sign outside.

In an effort to shine the light on the work of state dog wardens and provide a consumer service, we are posting a list of kennel operators cited for running unlicensed kennels in 2014:

Bedford County: Angela Holloway
Bucks County: Michelle Armstrong/Lulu’s Rescue
Clarion County: Richard Zettlemoyer
Clearfield County: Johanna Fuzy
Cumberland County: Tammy Little
Dauphin County: George Petrina/Vera Petrina; Louise Chronister
Erie County: Cathleen Mogush
Franklin County: Crystal Rush;  Dennis Bumbaugh (Better Days Animal Society); Kathy Ferguson; Thomas M. Ferguson; Daniel Baer;Sherry Kinsey
Fulton County:  Vivian Painter
Huntingdon County: Joseph Finkey
Indiana County: Melissa Gromley/Plumcreek Acres; Elmer Mark Zook
Lackawanna County: Jeffrey Luizza
Lancaster County: John Esh/Mary Esh (formerly Twin Maple kennel);Daniel Esh (formerly Clearview/Scarlet Maple Kennel); Katie Lapp; Barbie Beiler
Lawrence County: Melanie Kiger (Kigers Bostons)
Lehigh County: Jance Vasilik
Luzerne County: Jolene Caparro; Ashley Dancho
Mercer County: Lori Reynolds
Montgomery Couny: Stephen Paladino (Karadino Bulldogs)
Montour County: Seth Lins
Northampton County: Harold Keck
Snyder County: Charles Jackson; Amanda Henry; Robert Henry
Somerset County: Nancy Coleman (Coleman’s Critters Camp)
Venango County: Jaime Smalley (Puppy Wood Shihtzus)
Washington County: Jeanie Sexauer (The Puppy Connection); Marcia Hupp
Kimberly Ann Rice (Divine Destiny Rescue)
Wayne County: Philip Card
Westmoreland County: Janice Huffman Short

Amy_WordenAmy Worden is a politics and government reporter for the Inquirer. In that capacity she has explored a range of animal protection issues from dog kennel law improvements and banning horse slaughter to the comeback of peregrine falcons and pigeon hunts. From hamsters to horses, animals have always been part of her life.

Posted in Animal cruelty, Humane Society, Pennsylvania legislation, Puppy Mills | Tagged , ,

Top 10 Blogs of 2014

The Humane PA blog is intended to educate, inspire, train, engage and sometimes entertain Pennsylvanians who care about animals, and our readers sure are a diverse group! Some members appreciate tips on effectively using their time to make a difference for animals, some like good news, some like an in depth look at the growing importance of politicizing animal advocacy, and some like compelling information. Humane PA has been blessed this year with many wonderful guest bloggers. Looking back over 2014, we are sharing the top 10  based on the number of “clicks” on the blog.

  1. Who is Humane PA?
  2. What Animal Shelters can do to Influence Policy
  3. Keith Mohler – an Unsung Hero
  4. One Person Can Make a Difference
  5. Justice Finally Comes to Animal Victims – “Cost of Care” is Law
  6. Facebook Basics for Making a Difference
  7. Good Things Come To Those Who Wait – So Long As They Outwork The Devils While They Wait
  8. Lobbyist…not a four letter word!
  9. Pets Are No More Than Kitchen Chairs
  10. The Race for Pennsylvania Governor – Four Candidates Take a Stand Against Animal Cruelty
Posted in 2014 Pennsylvania Election, Legislation, non profit lobbying, Pennsylvania Law and animals, Pennsylvania legislation, Pennsylvania Politics | Tagged , ,

One Person Can Make a Difference

Guest Blog by Mary Kennedy Withrow

Two years ago, if you would have told me that in the coming years I would effectively influence policy anywhere but within my own household, I would have told you that was absurd. How could I, a volunteer at an animal shelter and gardener, ever accomplish such a thing? Fast forward and here I am-sweaty palms, butterflies, racing heart, and hearing my friend’s voice say, “a little anxiety is good, you’ll perform better”- sitting in the beautiful Pittsburgh City Council Chambers awaiting my turn to testify.  I studied, I knew the facts, I knew the language, and most of all I was determined.


I had written my letters and done my part on the proposed statewide anti-tethering bill, SB 522, but, unfortunately, it did not receive a vote. I saw York, Harrisburg and more passing their own anti-tethering ordinances. Hmmm, why can’t I, an ordinary citizen, work to see Pittsburgh follow in their footsteps? I knew Councilwoman Darlene Harris had introduced many laws over the years to help the animals. I’ll try that angle. I had been following and paying close attention to the tips, advice and tools of effective lobbying on the Humane PA Facebook page, as well as their website.  I made calls, I visited my legislators, I made trips to Harrisburg for “Humane Lobby Days.” I felt I had the knowledge and confidence to give this a shot.

I collected the language of the aforementioned cities that had enacted such ordinances. I spoke to the folks in those towns who had introduced their laws.  What were the successes, the problems and what would they change?  I gathered facts on tethered dogs from the CDC, AVMA, USDA, HSUS, ASPCA. All these groups had come out against 24/7 tethering of dogs. In my own work at my shelter, I had seen frozen dogs, severely hypothermic dogs, including a 10 month old dog who had hung himself on a fence while tethered and a dog with his collar that had become so deeply embedded that he had a quarter-inch thick cut in his neck.  The “big dogs” (pun intended) had strong data and statistics to support anti-tethering language and I had the everlasting awful visions of what can happen to tethered dogs.

I decided to email Councilwoman Harris. Not two hours later I received a call from Ms. Harris’ legislative assistant telling me that she would like to speak with me about my legislation. My legislation? After many emails back and forth and conversations with her amazing assistant, we came up with language that we liked. It was introduced the following week. Then it was my turn to sit at the table with members of council-a TV camera in my face, a microphone in front of me and members prepared to ask questions. My heart was racing but in the back of my mind I remembered bitter cold nights, lying in my bed thinking “I know they’re out there” and THIS was my chance to help them.

After a long 30 minutes of testimony, it was time for the first vote. The chair asked “All in favor?” I held my breath and then I heard a resounding “aye.”  “All opposed?”  Total silence-it was unanimous.  “Ms. Withrow, can you return next week for the final vote?”  I had to control my desire to happy dance my way out of the room and answered calmly “sure.”

Stay tuned for the final results tomorrow…

Update on December 15th:  The ordinance passed unanimously and is on its way to Mayor Peduto!





Mary Kennedy Withrow is a proud member of Humane PA PAC, an Animal Rescue Volunteer for The Humane Society of the United States and Community Outreach Coordinator for the Animal Rescue League Shelter & Wildlife Center in Pittsburgh.


Pittsburgh considers new rules for dogs in extreme weather | Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pet Tales: Proposal would regulate dog houses and tethering

Posted in Animal cruelty, Animal shelters, Community outreach, Tethering dogs

Good Things Come To Those Who Wait – So Long As They Outwork The Devils While They Wait

Guest blog by Senator Roy Afflerbach, Ret.Powerful4

Thanks to patient, steadfast, relentless repetition and perseverance by animal advocates during the 2013/14 Pennsylvania legislative session, more than two-dozen bills favorable to animals were introduced. One of the strongest bills passed this session provides for the cost of care for animals rescued from cruelty and it was signed into law.  Two others affecting the protection of police dogs also passed.  Two more bills,  the bill to end live pigeon shoots and the slaughter of dogs and cats for human consumption as well as the animal fighting paraphernalia bill made it to the final steps and were almost voted on before the end of October, and every bill that negatively affected animals except one has died. This has been no easy task.

Some may ask, why haven’t more bills passed? Why is it taking so long? What is the legislature doing?

These are not uncommon questions as people look to Pennsylvania’s full-time legislature for action on a variety of issues. Unfortunately, many people consider action to be the passage of new legislation, forgetting that others consider preventing the passage of new legislation to be action. The goal of these individuals is to contain or reduce the influence of government. Often, they consider the passage of legislation to be an expansion of government and they will do whatever they can do to prevent action.

Some people may suggest that the struggle to pass legislation is a contemporary phenomenon. It is not. The writings of the founders of both the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution indicate that they deliberately designed our democratic system of government to be arduous in the passage of legislation to avoid knee-jerk reaction to a temporary public outcry. Their writings further indicate that the founders felt legislation with merit would survive the hurdles and eventually rise to the level of passage into law.

Consequently, on average only 4% to 8% of the all bills introduced in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and the Senate combined become law in a 2-year legislative session. In the present 2013-2014 session, 263 or 7% of the 3816 bills introduced have become law. In the 2011-2012 session, 285 or 8% of the 4310 bills introduced became law, and in the 2009-2010 session only 181 or 4% of the 4274 bills introduced became law.

Moreover, fully 100 to 120 bills passed in each session (50 to 60 bills per year) are “mandatory” bills. They are necessary to keep the state, local governments, and school districts operating, or are necessary to meet federal requirements. In the 2009-2010 session those “mandatory” bills represented more than half of the bills that became law.

Because of the small number of bills that are actually passed in a session, the question becomes not “why hasn’t this bill passed,” but rather “how do we move a bill ahead of the other 92% to 96% that won’t be considered?” It will never be easy to convince 102 of 203 personalities in the House or 26 of 50 members of the Senate, in addition to a Governor and his/her administration, to support new legislation – especially if it is opposed by powerful interest groups. But with patience, perseverance, relentless repetition of taking the issue to the legislature, and occasionally replacing recalcitrant legislators or Governors through the election process, passage can be achieved.

In short, success in the legislative arena is not for the impatient or faint of heart. It is most often a marathon, not a sprint. Individuals or organizations that recognize this fact and approach legislation with disciplined staying power are the most likely to succeed! That is why bills to promote the compassionate treatment of animals are in position to become part of next session’s 7%!

Roy Afflerbach



In addition to being a co- founder and Treasurer of Humane PA PAC, Senator Roy C. Afflerbach, Ret. is founder and President of The Afflerbach Group, LLC.

Posted in Animal cruelty, Legislation, Pennsylvania Law and animals, Pennsylvania legislation, Pennsylvania Politics, Uncategorized

Top 5 Ways to Give Animals a Voice at the Polls

Election Day presents great opportunities to give animals a voice in Harrisburg, and give visibility to the growing bloc of people for whom the treatment of animals is an important election issue.  Candidates work the polls all day and are eager to talk to voters- especially right before you enter your voting site!   This is a time that they WANT your vote and will rosebudWANT to talk to you.  If the candidates are not at a particular voting location, often their best volunteers, friends and relatives are and they can pass messages on or even get a candidate on the phone for a quick chat with you.

1. VOTE–and don’t forget to take your Humane PA endorsement list with you!

2. Make it a mission–Spend time talking to the candidates if they are at your polling location as well as every campaign volunteer to let them know that you care about the treatment of animals and are there to vote to help elect humane candidates.  A quick conversation  helps legislators and candidates know that we get out the vote!

3.  Talk up Endorsement–If you do not have an endorsed candidate – especially if they are the incumbent – tell them we would like to be able to endorse next time-but we need their cooperation!

4. You are there to help–If you have a good candidate, volunteer to help his/her campaign and perhaps even work the polls on Election Day.

5. Share Humane PA GOTV messages–check and share endorsement lists throughout the day to remind your friends to vote!  There are candidates running for office who will fight animal cruelty and abuse, and stand up for the values of kindness and compassion.

In order to have humane laws, we must elect humane lawmakers. Let’s win the day for animals on November 4!

Posted in 2014 Pennsylvania Election, Animal cruelty, Pennsylvania election, Pennsylvania Governor, Pennsylvania legislation, Pennsylvania Politics, Voter scorecard